Tag Archives: Agrochemicals

Parkinson’s and Roundup: latest in a long list

We already knew

Argentinian farmers were suing Monsanto
about Roundup-induced birth defects, including
cerebral palsy, down syndrome, psychomotor retardation, missing fingers, and blindness;
we knew Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate was

“a risk factor for developing Non-Hodgkin lymphoma”;
we knew that Roundup-ready corn

causes liver and kidney damage in rats
and

chickens fed feed including Monsanto corn show abnormal gene expression,
and we knew that

Roundup-ready corn is toxic to humans.
Add to all that: Roundup is a risk for Parkinson’s disease.

Sayer Ji wrote for GreenMediaInfo 18 April 2012,

Roundup Herbicide Linked To Parkinson’s-Related Brain Damage,

Alarming new research published in the journal

Neurotoxicology and Teratology


supports the emerging connection between glyphosate, the
active ingredient in Roundup herbicide, and neurodegenerative
conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonian disorders.

Published this month

(April, 2012), the new study entitled
“Glyphosate induced cell death through apoptotic and
authophagic mechanisms,” investigated the potential
brain-damaging effects of herbicides, which the authors stated
“have been recognized as the main environmental factor
associated with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s
disease.”1

They found that glyphosate inhibited the viability of differentiated
test cells (PC12, adrenal medula derived), in both dose-and-time
dependent manners. The researchers also found that “glyphosate
induced cell death via authophagy pathways in addition to activating
apoptotic pathways.”

Roundup herbicide is now a ubiquitous contaminant in our air, rain,
groundwater, and food, making complete avoidance near impossible. A
growing body of experimental evidence now indicates that it in
addition to its neurotoxicity it also has the following.

Modes of Toxicity

Continue reading →

The whistleblowers show sued Fox (and lost)



Fox News hired Jane Akre and a couple of other reporters as an
investigative unit and did a snazzy promo about that.
The first case they investigated was Monsanto’s bovine growth hormone, RBGH.
This is the whistleblower story behind the

Fox Can Lie lawsuit.

ITN in the U.K. reporting about Health Canada’s report on bovine growth hormone:

Monsanto’s engineered growth hormone did not comply with safety requirements.
It could be absorbed by the body, and therefore did have implications
for human health.
Mysteriously, that conclusion was deleted from the final, published version
of their report.

That was for a product that U.S. EPA had approved with little or no testing.
Fox’s investigative unit had the story, but Monsanto threatened to sue Fox.
Watch
the video for the details.

Eventually, Akre sued Fox.

She won, but

Fox won on appeal.
An appeal that established that Fox can lie.

-jsq

PS: Owed to Paul Hollands.

Gretchen Quarterman at Lowndes County Extension 14 June 2012





As a

Georgia Master Gardener, Gretchen Quarterman volunteers two
afternoons one afternoon a week at the Lowndes County Extension Office on US 84 east of Valdosta,
identifying plants and pests, and making recommendations to citizens who call in or who bring in samples.

Closeup sample in bottle:


Closeup sample in bottle


Closeup sample in bottle

Pictures by John S. Quarterman for Okra Paradise Farms, Lowndes County, Georgia, 14 June 2012.

Sample in bottle:

Continue reading →

Want some 2,4-D with that drifting Roundup and Paraquat?

Got enough Roundup and Paraquat drifting onto you? Want some 2,4-D with that? If not, you can send your comments to USDA now. Hey, what if we all plowed under the mutant pigweed instead of breeding more with poison soup!

Tom Philpott wrote for Mother Jones 18 July 2012, USDA Prepares To Greenlight Gnarliest GMO Soy Yet,

In early July, on the sleepy Friday after Independence Day, the USDA quietly signaled its intention to greenlight a new genetically engineered soybean seed from Dow AgroSciences. The product is designed to produce soy plants that withstand 2,4-D, a highly toxic herbicide (and, famously, the less toxic component in the notorious Vietnam War-era defoliant Agent Orange).

Readers may remember that during an even-sleepier period—the week between Christmas and the New Year—the USDA made a similar move on Dow’s 2,4-D-ready corn.

If the USDA deregulates the two products—as it has telegraphed its intention to do—Dow will enjoy a massive profit opportunity. Every year, about half of all US farmland is planted in corn and soy. Currently, Dow’s rival Monsanto has a tight grip on weed management in corn-and-soy country. Upwards of 90 percent of soy and 70 percent of corn is engineered to withstand another herbicide called glyphosate through highly profitable Monsanto’s Roundup Ready seed lines. And after so many years of lashing so much land with the same herbicide, glyphosate-resistant superweeds are now vexing farmers and “alarming” weed-control experts throughout the midwest.

And that’s where Dow’s 2,4-D-ready corn and soy seeds come in. Dow’s novel products will be engineered to withstand glyphosate and 2,4-D, so farmers can douse their fields with both herbicides; the 2,4-D will kill the weeds that glyphosate no longer can. That’s the marketing pitch, anyway.

There’s more in the article.

It can also get into your well water, and then, according to EPA:

Continue reading →

Greed is Good for Poisoning the Food Supply?

For many years big agro has treated the world’s health as an economic externality, a problem for somebody else that did not affect its own bottom line. That is starting to change, most recently in Argentina.

Anthony Gucciardi wrote for NaturalSociety 11 April 2012, Explosive: Monsanto ‘Knowingly Poisoned Workers’ Causing Devastating Birth Defects,

In a developing news piece just unleashed by a courthouse news wire, Monsanto is being brought to court by dozens of Argentinean tobacco farmers who say that the biotech giant knowingly poisoned them with herbicides and pesticides and subsequently caused ”devastating birth defects” in their children. The farmers are now suing not only Monsanto on behalf of their children, but many big tobacco giants as well. The birth defects that the farmers say occurred as a result are many, and include cerebral palsy, down syndrome, psychomotor retardation, missing fingers, and blindness.

This would be the same Monsanto that was convicted of chemical poisoning in France.

But this is once again far away in a small country of which we know nothing, right? Wrong:

The farmers come from small family-owned farms in Misiones Province and sell their tobacco to many United States distributors. The family farmers say that major tobacco companies like the Philip Morris company asked them to use Monsanto’s herbicides and pesticides, assuring them that the products were safe. Through asserting that the toxic chemicals were safe, the farmers state in their claim that the tobacco companies ”wrongfully caused the parental and infant plaintiffs to be exposed to those chemicals and substances which they both knew, or should have known, would cause the infant offspring of the parental plaintiffs to be born with devastating birth defects.”

Still, it must be some obscure poison only sold in the third world, right?

Wrong:

The majority of the farmers in the area used Monsanto’s Roundup, an herbicide with the active ingredient glyphosate that has shown to be killing human kidney cells. What’s more, the farmers say that the tobacco companies pushed Monsanto’s Roundup on the farmers despite a lack of protective equipment. In other words, these farmers — many in dire economic conditions — were being directly exposed to Roundup in large concentrations without any protective gear (or even experience or skills in handling the substance). Still, the farmers say the tobacco giants required the struggling farmers to ‘purchase excessive quantities of Roundup and other pesticides’.

That would be the same Roundup that farmers use around here all the time, without protective equipment. The Roundup we already knew was

Continue reading →

11 year old is onto Monsanto and how to fix the food system

The “dark side of the industrialized food system.”
as related (accurately) by

Birke Baehr
at

TEDxNextGeneration Asheville.



Conventional farmers use chemical fertilizers made from fossil fuels.
Then they mess with the dirt to make the plants grow.
They do this because they’ve stripped the soil from all nutrients
from growing the same crop over and over again.
Next more harmful chemicals are sprayed on fruits and vegetables.
Like pesticides and herbicides to kill weeds and bugs.
When it rains, these chemicals seep into the ground,
or rise into our waterways, poisoning our water, too.

His personal goal:

A while back, I wanted to be an NFL footall player.

I decided I’d rather be an organic farmer instead.

[applause]

That way I can have a greater impact on the world.

He’s got a turn of phrase:

We can either pay the farmer, or we can pay the hospital.

-jsq

Hiding the Truth About Factory Farms —NYTimes

In an

editorial on 26 April 2011, the New York Times opined:



A supermarket shopper buying hamburger, eggs or milk has every reason,
and every right, to wonder how they were produced. The answer, in
industrial agriculture, is “behind closed doors,” and that’s how
the industry wants to keep it. In at least three states — Iowa, Florida,
and Minnesota — legislation is moving ahead that would make undercover
investigations in factory farms, especially filming and photography,
a crime. The legislation has only one purpose: to hide factory-farming
conditions from a public that is beginning to think seriously about
animal rights and the way food is produced.

Would people really want to eat CAFO chicken, beef, or pork if they
knew it came from animals that are kept in pens so small they can’t
move and fed antibiotics constantly to keep them from dying of diseases
they give each other from standing in their own feces?

Also, I’m a Farm Bureau members, but this makes me ill:

And they are supported by the big guns of industrial agriculture:
Monsanto, the Farm Bureau, the associations that represent pork
producers, dairy farmers and cattlemen, as well as poultry, soybean,
and corn growers.

Farming used to be something to be proud of, not something to hide.

-jsq

Two Mexican states ban GM corn

Many if not most pesticides are sprayed on crops genetically modified
to resist them. Ban GM crops and reduce spraying. Two states in Mexico
prove it can be done. Mexico, the country where corn was originally
domesticated could lead the way back to healthy agriculture.

Aleira Lara reported in
Health Impact News Daily reported 5 March 2011 that

Two Mexican states ban GM corn:



The Mexican States of Tlaxcala and Michoacán each passed legislation
banning the planting of genetically modified corn to protect natural
plants from further contamination of transgenes. Together, both states
produce about a third of all of Mexico’s corn. Below this story is a
detailed timeline of genetic contamination and legislation in Mexico.

The timeline is a long saga including intimidation of scientists
attempting to research the problem.
The Mexican federal government caved in to big agro,
but two Mexican states are fighting back anyway.

-jsq

Genetic engineering based on obsolete science and regulatory capture –peer-reviewed research



Here is peer-reviewed evidence that we are the guinea pigs
for worldwide experimentation on the food supply
using fatally-flawed science.
Experimentation that isn’t needed because we already know how to do it right.

We already knew Monsanto is

blocking independent GMO research in the U.S. (L.A. Times op-ed)
and there are numerous examples of

Monsanto gaming regulatory systems.
Now

Ken Rosenboro of The Organic and Non-GMO Report tells us
there’s peer-reviewed research that says:

…the technology is based on obsolete science, that biotechnology
companies such as Monsanto have too much influence on government
regulators and “public” universities, and that university scientists
are ignoring the health and environmental risks of GM crops.

The research is published as two papers by Don Lotter in the
International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food:

Part 1:

The Development of a Flawed Enterprise

Part 2:

Academic Capitalism and the Loss of Scientific Integrity

In a 7 August 2009 article in FoodFirst,

The Genetic Engineering of Food and the Failure of Science,
Don Lotter explains what’s in those two papers:

Continue reading →

The case against agrochemicals


Some people didn’t like the source of a recent post about
the toxic effects of agrochemicals and GM plants on the environment,
plants, animals, and people.
There are plenty of other sources, including:

How big agro causes the problem

Evidence of the ill effects

There are ways forward

What you can do